17. October 2020 at 21:28 #14252Sergio GomezParticipant
I would like to calculate and plot the spectral efficiency improvements using NOMA. The simulator just gives the graphic results based in BER and Throughput.
Would you please give some advice about how to do it?
Thanks in advance.
Sergio20. October 2020 at 7:46 #14264Mariam MussbahKeymaster
All results (i.e. throughtput, BER, FER) are stored in the objects downlinkResults and uplinkResults.
20. October 2020 at 13:39 #14272Kiril KirevParticipant
- This reply was modified 4 months, 1 week ago by Mariam Mussbah.
if You wish to include an online calculation and plotting of the system’s SE after each simulation end, then I might also suggest a slight modification to a couple of simulator files to achieve that.
First You’ll need to expand the properties of the ‘UserResults’ class in
+Results/UserResults.mto include spectral efficiency and also to initialize it properly upon class construction. You could just copy-paste the lines for ‘Throughput’, for instance, and rename them.
Second, for the actual parameter calculation: since the SE is closely related to the system’s throughput, You could reuse the Throughput calculation code in
+Results/SimulationResults.m, lines 175-184, and divide it by the chosen system bandwidth to obtain the SE. N.B The bandwidth is not an input parameter, but is rather determined by subcarrier spacing and number of subcarriers. This info is not accessible within the ‘UserResults.m’ file, so either You’ll need to manually change the bandwidth values or further change the simulator structure in order to gain access.
Lastly, in order to plot the SE, simply expand the code in
+Results/plotResults.min a similar copy-paste manner with the lines 123-151 and change the throughput container to the one You specified in the previous steps.
Hope this helps!
Kiril27. October 2020 at 16:22 #14327Sergio GomezParticipant
Thank you very much for your answer.
But now I have a question about the results.
According to the theory, it is supposed that NOMA scheme improves the SE in the system and for FarUser, but in my simulation, when I run a no NOMA scenario vs NOMA scenario, in the second one, the SE for UE2 gets worst than in scenario1. The same results are obtained for the throughput.
Am I doing something wrong?
Thank you in advance.
Sergio11. November 2020 at 10:02 #14366Bashar TahirParticipant
The implementation of NOMA in our simulator is based on the 3GPP MUST scheme in which the farUE is limited to QPSK modulation. The scheme is to be used such that a strong cell-center UE is coupled with a weak cell-edge UE that cannot transmit with high rate anyway to begin with.
If you switch to OMA, and let the transmit power of the BS increases, then sure, at some point the farUE will no longer be weak (since it now has very high SNR), and then it would comfortably switch to high modulation orders and code rates, hence, resulting in a higher throughput.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.