[Cornel Balint]

Dear Sir,
Running the Simulator with default settings in original numerology scenario file and different scheduling:

1.
scStr.schedule.fixedSchedule{1} = [ ‘UE1:96,none:112’ ];
scStr.schedule.fixedSchedule{2} = [ ‘none:28,UE2:24’ ];

2.
% scStr.schedule.fixedSchedule{1} = [ ‘UE1:96,none:112’ ];
% scStr.schedule.fixedSchedule{2} = [ ‘UE2:24,none:28’ ];

the results show a higher throughput in the second case compare to the first one.
Are these results right?
We consider that in the second case we should obtain a lower throughput because of higher interference.

[Stefan Pratschner]

Hi,

is the throughput increased for UE1 or UE2 or both of them?

best
Stefan

[Cornel Balint]

The throughputs have the same behaviour for both users.
Thank you for prompt answer to my posts,
best regards,
Cornel

[Stefan Pratschner]

Dear Cornel,

thank your for your feedback.

The new version of the Vienna 5G Link Level Simulator is officially release since yesterday. I just tried this described setup with the new version and it behaves as expected: the throughput of both users decreases significantly due to the increased interference.

I highly encourage you to switch to the new version and start out with the multi-link scenario to simulate your desired setup.

Let me know if your encounter further issues.

best
Stefan

[Author]

Posts