Throughput for different Scheduling

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #10608
    Cornel Balint
    Participant

    Dear Sir,
    Running the Simulator with default settings in original numerology scenario file and different scheduling:

    1.
    scStr.schedule.fixedSchedule{1} = [ ‘UE1:96,none:112’ ];
    scStr.schedule.fixedSchedule{2} = [ ‘none:28,UE2:24’ ];

    2.
    % scStr.schedule.fixedSchedule{1} = [ ‘UE1:96,none:112’ ];
    % scStr.schedule.fixedSchedule{2} = [ ‘UE2:24,none:28’ ];

    the results show a higher throughput in the second case compare to the first one.
    Are these results right?
    We consider that in the second case we should obtain a lower throughput because of higher interference.

    #10611

    Hi,

    is the throughput increased for UE1 or UE2 or both of them?

    best
    Stefan

    #10612
    Cornel Balint
    Participant

    The throughputs have the same behaviour for both users.
    Thank you for prompt answer to my posts,
    best regards,
    Cornel

    #10635

    Dear Cornel,

    thank your for your feedback.

    The new version of the Vienna 5G Link Level Simulator is officially release since yesterday. I just tried this described setup with the new version and it behaves as expected: the throughput of both users decreases significantly due to the increased interference.

    I highly encourage you to switch to the new version and start out with the multi-link scenario to simulate your desired setup.

    Let me know if your encounter further issues.

    best
    Stefan

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.